Thursday, October 3, 2019
Comparing Mozambique and South Africas Demographics
Comparing Mozambique and South Africas Demographics    Period    Live births per year    Deaths per year    Natural Increase per year    Crude Birth Rate (per 1,000 per year)    Crude Death Rate (per 1,000 per year)    Natural Increase (per 1,000 per year)    Total Fertility Rate (over avge womans life)    Infant Mortality Rate (per 100,000 live births)    1950ââ¬â1955    629 000    295 000    + 334 000    43.3    20.3    + 23.0    6.50    96    1955ââ¬â1960    697 000    297 000    + 400 000    42.5    18.1    + 24.4    6.50    91    1960ââ¬â1965    774 000    310 000    + 464 000    41.6    16.7    + 25.0    6.30    87    1965ââ¬â1970    808 000    312 000    + 496 000    38.2    14.7    + 23.5    5.70    84    1970ââ¬â1975    909 000    317 000    + 592 000    37.7    13.1    + 24.6    5.47    77    1975ââ¬â1980    980 000    319 000    + 661 000    35.8    11.7    + 24.1    5.00    71    1980ââ¬â1985    1 052 000    307 000    + 745 000    33.9    9.9    + 24.0    4.56    61    1985ââ¬â1990    1 086 000    299 000    + 787 000    31.1    8.6    + 22.5    4.00    53    1990ââ¬â1995    1 073 000    332 000    + 742 000    27.5    8.5    + 19.0    3.34    51    1995ââ¬â2000    1 082 000    450 000    + 632 000    25.1    10.4    + 14.7    2.95    56    2000ââ¬â2005    1 111 000    645 000    + 466 000    24.0    13.9    + 10.1    2.80    59    2005ââ¬â2010    1 074 000    746 000    + 328 000    21.9    15.2    + 6.7    2.55    55    In the table we can see the increase in population per year on average for 5 year spans  Mozambique    Period    Live births per year    Deaths per year    Natural change per year    CBR*    CDR*    NC*    TFR*    IMR*    1950-1955    331 000    220 000    111 000    49.4    32.8    16.5    6.60    220    1955-1960    359 000    219 000    140 000    49.1    30.0    19.1    6.60    201    1960-1965    392 000    222 000    170 000    48.6    27.5    21.1    6.60    185    1965-1970    430 000    230 000    201 000    48.0    25.6    22.4    6.60    172    1970-1975    474 000    236 000    238 000    47.2    23.5    23.7    6.58    158    1975-1980    534 000    247 000    288 000    46.9    21.7    25.3    6.53    146    1980-1985    584 000    272 000    313 000    45.9    21.3    24.5    6.44    143    1985-1990    586 000    283 000    302 000    43.6    21.1    22.5    6.33    143    1990-1995    640 000    293 000    347 000    43.4    19.9    23.6    6.12    134    1995-2000    739 000    301 000    438 000    43.3    17.6    25.7    5.85    115    2000-2005    844 000    326 000    518 000    43.3    16.7    26.6    5.52    99    2005-2010    869 000    341 000    528 000    39.4    15.4    23.9    5.11    88    *CBR = crude birth rate (per 1000); CDR = crude death rate (per 1000); NC = natural change (per 1000); IMR = infant mortality rate per 1000 births; TFR = total fertility rate (number of children per woman)    Mozambique  Loss of natural habitat  About 80% of Mozambiqueââ¬â¢s population live in rural areas and depend on wood for cooking and for heating of water for domestic use, space heating and drying of foodstuffs.1This reliance on trees could spell disaster should population levels rise. Mangroves are being removed and converted into rice farms and salt pans, aquaculture and housing. Further offshore, corals are subjected to destructive fishing practices (e.g. use of fine mesh nets and dynamite).    à © WWF  Illegal and unsustainable wildlife use, and human wildlife conflict  In Mozambique like elsewhere in Africa and Asia, habitat loss is causing humans and wildlife to share increasingly smaller living spaces. Both sides are losing in the conflicts that ensue, such as in and around the Delta of the Zambezi River. There, crocodiles and hippos are coming face to face with humans increasingly often, while poaching and other illegal activities put species in jeopardy. In some places, such as Quirimbas National Park, there are concerns that current levels of resource use ââ¬â e.g. sand oysters  may not be sustainable, and are already leading to diminishing harvests of fish and other resources. For local people, this means reduced incomes and increased poverty in the long run.  Pollution  Off Mozambiqueââ¬â¢s coast, tankers carrying crude oil from the Arabian Gulf have resulted in contamination of the sea from spills and discharge of polluted ballast waters. In urban settings, rural sewage treatment is inadequate, exposing people to potential outbreaks of disease.  Agriculture  Poor farming practices and deforestation contribute to sedimentation of rivers that run to the sea, degrading seagrasses and coral reefs  South Africa  Water is perhaps South Africas most critical resource  one of low abundance and growing needs. Tie that with problems of increased land use and population growth and you have several big reasons for concern.  Lack of water South Africas freshwater supply is almost stretched to its limit. Less than 10% of South Africaââ¬â¢s rainfall is available as surface water, one of the lowest conversion ratios in the world. The countryââ¬â¢s groundwater resources are equally limited. Despite regulations of river waters, in many catchments the need for water exceeds the supply and quality is often below standards. Given the projected growth in population and economic development, South Africa faces tough times in meeting water demands in the decades ahead. The shortfall in freshwater is tied to growing demands, but also to other issues such as loss of natural habitat and potentially climate change.    à © WWF-Canon / John E. NEWBY  Destruction of natural habitats The land of the fine-leaved plants, the South African Fynbos, is one of the worldââ¬â¢s most impressive botanical kingdoms  a mind-boggling variety of plants that is richer than any other comparable sized area in Africa. An estimated 8,500 species of vascular plants, of which 70% are endemic (they are found nowhere else in the world), are reported here. But because the area has been heavily settled for several centuries, large swathes of natural vegetation, particularly in the lowlands, have been cleared for agriculture and urban development. Similar problems face the Namib-Karoo-Kaokeveld desert, a very distinctive and floristically rich ecoregion with highly diverse endemic plant communities. Here, poor land management, conversion of marginal lands for cultivation, dam construction, mining, and illegal extraction of selected succulents for black market trade, pose a suite of threats.    à © WWF  Overfishing Along the West Coast of South Africa, there is persistent overharvesting of many commercially valuable species and products such as pilchard, anchovy and rock lobster. Further at sea, some fish stocks have been over-harvested, and several species face local extinction. These dangerous trends follow improvements of fishing methods, increase in fishing effort and the establishment of fishing industries.  Introduction of exotic species South Africas natural habitats are being colonized by alien species at great rates. Introduced species, particularly North American gamefishes such as largemouth bass and smallmouth bass, are pushing out indigenous species and threaten to lead some of them to extinction.  Pollution A high level of traffic associated with crude oil transport from the Arabian Gulf has resulted in contamination from tankers spills and discharge of polluted ballast waters.  Reference List  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_South_Africa  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Mozambique  http://wwf.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/mozambique/environmental_problems_in_mozambique/  http://wwf.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/south_africa/environmental_problems__in_south_africa/    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.